MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00941-4

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 2001

Incidence of priapism in the general population.

Eland I A, van der Lei J, Stricker B H, Sturkenboom M J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of priapism in the general population.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study within a general practitioners research database. Our study population comprised all male patients with permanent registration status with a general practitioner. All patients with an International Classification for Primary Care code for penile problems (Y01, Y04, Y08) were identified. In addition, a free text search on priapism and painful erection was conducted. The computerized medical records from all potential patients were reviewed, and we requested additional information from the general practitioner if priapism was suspected.

RESULTS

The total study cohort comprised 145,071 men, with a total follow-up of 341,133 person-years. Five patients developed a first occurrence of priapism during the follow-up period, corresponding to an overall incidence rate of 1.5 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.2 to 2.8). The incidence rate in men 40 years old and older was 2.9 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.1 to 5.7). No cause of priapism was apparent in 2 patients, 2 cases occurred after intracavernous injection of vasodilators, and 1 patient experienced priapism because of sickle cell disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of priapism is low but seems higher than was previously assumed.

Для цитирования: Eland I A, van der Lei J, Stricker B H, Sturkenboom M J. Incidence of priapism in the general population.. Urology. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00941-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.