Minerva ginecologica · 2007
[Cesarean section, techniques and skin suture materials].
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Croce P, Frigoli A, Perotti D, Di Mario M
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome, complications and costs of three skin suture techniques after Caesarean section.
METHODS: The study sample was 310 women who underwent caesarean section between 2003 and 2007. The sample was divided into three groups: an intradermal suture with non-reabsorbable thread was applied in 98; metallic clips were placed in 90; 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) glue was used for wound closure in 112. The sutures were checked at 4 days and 2 months after the operation to determine cosmetic outcome, patient compliance, strength of incision closure, allergic reactions, suture infection, and total cost of each technique.
RESULTS: No substantial differences in strength of incision closure or cosmetic outcome between the techniques were found. Compliance was better in the group that received 2-OCA, while the total cost of suture alone was lower in the group that received the non-reabsorbable intradermal suture.
CONCLUSION: The results suggests that following Caesarean section according to Stark, skin suture with 2-OCA glue has the advantage of greater patient compliance, while intradermal thread suture is less costly with a cosmetic outcome comparable to that of the other two techniques.
METHODS: The study sample was 310 women who underwent caesarean section between 2003 and 2007. The sample was divided into three groups: an intradermal suture with non-reabsorbable thread was applied in 98; metallic clips were placed in 90; 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) glue was used for wound closure in 112. The sutures were checked at 4 days and 2 months after the operation to determine cosmetic outcome, patient compliance, strength of incision closure, allergic reactions, suture infection, and total cost of each technique.
RESULTS: No substantial differences in strength of incision closure or cosmetic outcome between the techniques were found. Compliance was better in the group that received 2-OCA, while the total cost of suture alone was lower in the group that received the non-reabsorbable intradermal suture.
CONCLUSION: The results suggests that following Caesarean section according to Stark, skin suture with 2-OCA glue has the advantage of greater patient compliance, while intradermal thread suture is less costly with a cosmetic outcome comparable to that of the other two techniques.