Sexually transmitted diseases · 2022
A Collaborative Intervention Between Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases to Increase Syphilis and HIV Screening in the Emergency Department.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lipps Ashley A, Bazan Jose A, Lustberg Mark E, Sobhanie Mohammad Mahdee, Pollak Brandon, Nandam Kushal, Koletar Susan L, Lindsey Sommer, Dick Michael, Malvestutto Carlos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a common reason for evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Given the overlapping risk factors for STIs, patients screened for gonorrhea and chlamydia should be tested for syphilis and HIV. Syphilis and HIV testing rates in the ED have been reported to be low. The study objective was to examine whether collaboration between emergency medicine (EM) and infectious disease (ID) providers improved syphilis and HIV testing in the ED.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of EM and ID providers was formed to identify and address barriers to syphilis and HIV testing in the ED. Syphilis, HIV, chlamydia, and gonorrhea testing and infection rates were calculated and compared during 2 time periods: preintervention (January 1, 2012-December 30, 2017) and postintervention (November 1, 2018-November 30, 2019). We also extracted clinical and laboratory data from patients with positive syphilis and HIV results during the study period.
RESULTS: The most commonly cited barrier to syphilis and HIV testing was concern about follow-up of positive results. Compared with the preintervention period, syphilis and HIV testing rates increased significantly in the postintervention period (incidence rate ratios, 30.70 [P < 0.0001] and 28.99 [P < 0.0001] for syphilis and HIV, respectively). The postintervention period was also associated with a significant increase in the identification of patients with positive syphilis and HIV results (incidence rate ratios, 7.02 [P < 0.0001] and 2.34 [P = 0.03], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between EM and ID providers resulted in a significant increase in syphilis and HIV testing and diagnosis in the ED.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of EM and ID providers was formed to identify and address barriers to syphilis and HIV testing in the ED. Syphilis, HIV, chlamydia, and gonorrhea testing and infection rates were calculated and compared during 2 time periods: preintervention (January 1, 2012-December 30, 2017) and postintervention (November 1, 2018-November 30, 2019). We also extracted clinical and laboratory data from patients with positive syphilis and HIV results during the study period.
RESULTS: The most commonly cited barrier to syphilis and HIV testing was concern about follow-up of positive results. Compared with the preintervention period, syphilis and HIV testing rates increased significantly in the postintervention period (incidence rate ratios, 30.70 [P < 0.0001] and 28.99 [P < 0.0001] for syphilis and HIV, respectively). The postintervention period was also associated with a significant increase in the identification of patients with positive syphilis and HIV results (incidence rate ratios, 7.02 [P < 0.0001] and 2.34 [P = 0.03], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between EM and ID providers resulted in a significant increase in syphilis and HIV testing and diagnosis in the ED.