British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 1997
Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Howie F L, Henshaw R C, Naji S A, Russell I T, Templeton A A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare health outcomes two years after medical abortion or vacuum aspiration in women recruited into a patient preference trial during 1990 to 1991.
DESIGN: Women recruited to the original, partially randomised study were contacted for assessment using a structured interview.
SETTING: Grampian region of Scotland, UK.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty women who had participated in a partially randomised study of first trimester abortion two years previously.
INTERVENTION: Vacuum aspiration or medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term general, reproductive and psychological health; acceptability of procedure; perceived value of choice of method of termination.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between women who had undergone medical abortion or vacuum aspiration two years previously in general, reproductive or psychological health. Almost all women placed a high value on the provision of choice of method of termination. There was a significant difference in perception of long term procedure acceptability among women who had been randomised to a method of termination.
CONCLUSIONS: Women should have the opportunity to choose the method of termination. This opportunity will result in high levels of acceptability, particularly at gestations under 50 days of amenorrhoea.
DESIGN: Women recruited to the original, partially randomised study were contacted for assessment using a structured interview.
SETTING: Grampian region of Scotland, UK.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty women who had participated in a partially randomised study of first trimester abortion two years previously.
INTERVENTION: Vacuum aspiration or medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term general, reproductive and psychological health; acceptability of procedure; perceived value of choice of method of termination.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between women who had undergone medical abortion or vacuum aspiration two years previously in general, reproductive or psychological health. Almost all women placed a high value on the provision of choice of method of termination. There was a significant difference in perception of long term procedure acceptability among women who had been randomised to a method of termination.
CONCLUSIONS: Women should have the opportunity to choose the method of termination. This opportunity will result in high levels of acceptability, particularly at gestations under 50 days of amenorrhoea.