Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2011
Etiology of rotator cuff tears in paraplegic patients: a case-control study.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akbar Michael, Brunner Manuela, Balean Gabriel, Grieser Thomas, Bruckner Thomas, Loew Markus, Fürstenberg Carl Hans, Raiss Patric
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the etiology and the demographic and functional characteristics of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in 100 paraplegic patients as compared with 100 able-bodied volunteers.
METHODS: The magnetic resonance imaging examination results of 200 shoulders in each group were analyzed. Clinical examination included the Constant score and a visual analog scale for pain intensity.
RESULTS: The prevalence of RCTs was 63% in paraplegic patients versus 15% in able-bodied volunteers (P < .0001). All RCTs in the paraplegic group were associated with symptoms. Among the patients with RCTs, full-thickness tears were detected in 78% of cases in the paraplegic patient group versus 73% of cases in the volunteer group. The rate of partial-thickness tears was 22% in the paraplegic group versus 27% in the volunteer group. Paraplegic patients had a lower Constant score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and range of motion and a higher pain intensity than the volunteer cohort. The mean tear width in paraplegic patients was 14.4 mm (range, 8-28 mm) versus 9.9 mm (range, 8-14 mm) in the volunteers (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The etiology of RCTs in paraplegic patients seems to be based on wear-and-tear mechanisms rather than aging. These results are important for our understanding of shoulder pathology in long-term paraplegic patients and show the impact of this problem.
METHODS: The magnetic resonance imaging examination results of 200 shoulders in each group were analyzed. Clinical examination included the Constant score and a visual analog scale for pain intensity.
RESULTS: The prevalence of RCTs was 63% in paraplegic patients versus 15% in able-bodied volunteers (P < .0001). All RCTs in the paraplegic group were associated with symptoms. Among the patients with RCTs, full-thickness tears were detected in 78% of cases in the paraplegic patient group versus 73% of cases in the volunteer group. The rate of partial-thickness tears was 22% in the paraplegic group versus 27% in the volunteer group. Paraplegic patients had a lower Constant score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and range of motion and a higher pain intensity than the volunteer cohort. The mean tear width in paraplegic patients was 14.4 mm (range, 8-28 mm) versus 9.9 mm (range, 8-14 mm) in the volunteers (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The etiology of RCTs in paraplegic patients seems to be based on wear-and-tear mechanisms rather than aging. These results are important for our understanding of shoulder pathology in long-term paraplegic patients and show the impact of this problem.