European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2002
Severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH): a critical analysis of eight years' experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bagolan P, Casaccia G, Nahom A, Trucchi A, Zangari A, Laviani R, Pirozzi N, Di Liso G, Orzalesi M
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES. 1) To define the best outcome of severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH); 2) to critically evaluate deaths in order to identify possible criteria of exclusion from ECMO; and 3) to identify CDHs which could benefit from ECMO.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 63 severe CDHs, 35 (55.6 %) survivors and 28 (44.4 %) nonsurvivors, subdivided into 2 groups according to age at death: Group I dying at 12 < or = 24 hours, and Group II dying at > 24 hours after birth. The three groups were compared on the basis of prenatal diagnosis, polyhydramnios, gestational age, birth weight, pneumothorax, best values of postductal PaCO 2 and PaO 2, clinical and echocardiographic signs of persistent pulmonary hypertension, and severity of pulmonary hypoplasia (i.e., body weight to bilateral lung weight ratio at autopsy).
RESULTS: PaCO 2, PaO 2 and degree of pulmonary hypoplasia were significantly worse in Group I compared to Group II and to survivors. PaCO 2 and PaO 2 in Group II did not differ significantly from those of survivors.
CONCLUSIONS: In severe CDH it is possible: 1) to achieve a survival rate of 56 % without ECMO; 2) to identify a group of patients (Group I = 27 %) with severe pulmonary hypoplasia who would probably die even with ECMO; and 3) to identify a group of patients (Group II = 17 %) who might benefit from ECMO treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 63 severe CDHs, 35 (55.6 %) survivors and 28 (44.4 %) nonsurvivors, subdivided into 2 groups according to age at death: Group I dying at 12 < or = 24 hours, and Group II dying at > 24 hours after birth. The three groups were compared on the basis of prenatal diagnosis, polyhydramnios, gestational age, birth weight, pneumothorax, best values of postductal PaCO 2 and PaO 2, clinical and echocardiographic signs of persistent pulmonary hypertension, and severity of pulmonary hypoplasia (i.e., body weight to bilateral lung weight ratio at autopsy).
RESULTS: PaCO 2, PaO 2 and degree of pulmonary hypoplasia were significantly worse in Group I compared to Group II and to survivors. PaCO 2 and PaO 2 in Group II did not differ significantly from those of survivors.
CONCLUSIONS: In severe CDH it is possible: 1) to achieve a survival rate of 56 % without ECMO; 2) to identify a group of patients (Group I = 27 %) with severe pulmonary hypoplasia who would probably die even with ECMO; and 3) to identify a group of patients (Group II = 17 %) who might benefit from ECMO treatment.