Outcomes after bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt with antegrade pulmonary blood flow in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE

We have left antegrade pulmonary blood flow (APBF) at bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCPS) only for high-risk patients. This study evaluates the indication and the outcomes of patients with APBF, compared to those without APBF.

METHODS

Patients with APBF after BCPS were identified among patients who underwent BCPS between 1997 and 2022. Outcomes of patients with and without APBF after BCPS were compared.

RESULTS

APBF was open in 38 (8.2%) of 461 patients. Median age (7.7 versus 6.3 months, p = 0.55) and weight (5.6 versus 6.1 kg, p = 0.75) at BCPS were similar in both groups. The most frequent indication for APBF was high pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) in 14 patients, followed by hypoxaemia in 10, and hypoplastic left pulmonary artery in 8. The source of APBF was the pulmonary trunk in 10 patients and the aortopulmonary shunt in 28. Median hospital stay after BCPS was longer (22 versus 14 days, p = 0.018) and hospital mortality was higher (10.5 versus 2.1%, p = 0.003) in patients with APBF compared to those without APBF. However, 448 hospital survivors showed similar survival after discharge following BCPS (p = 0.224). Survival after total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) was similar between the groups (p = 0.753), although patients with APBF were older at TCPC compared to those without (3.9 versus 2.2 years, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

APBF was left in 8% following BCPS in high-risk patients, mainly due to preoperative high PAP. Hospital survivors after BCPS demonstrated comparable survival in patients with and without APBF. Adding APBF at BCPS might be a useful option for high-risk patients.