DOI 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90123-3
Amrinone versus dopamine-nitroglycerin after reconstructive surgery for complete atrioventricular septal defect.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effectiveness and safety of amrinone and a combination of dopamine and nitroglycerin in infants after reconstructive surgery for congenital heart disease.
DESIGN
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
SETTING
Pediatric intensive care unit in a university hospital.
PARTICIPANTS
Thirty-two infants with complete atrioventricular septal defect.
INTERVENTIONS: Amrinone loading dose, 2 mg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion, 7.5 micrograms/kg/min, was given to 17 infants before separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. The remaining 15 patients received a combination of dopamine, 5 micrograms/kg/min, and nitroglycerin, 1 microgram/kg/min.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
RESULTS
The circulatory state of the patients was evaluated from 4 to 18 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass. The systemic blood flow index, calculated using the Fick principle, was higher in the amrinone group (2.5 +/- 0.7 L/min/m2) compared with the dopamine-nitroglycerin group (2.0 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2, mean +/- SD). The pulmonary blood flow index in the amrinone group was higher (2.9 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2) than in the dopamine-nitroglycerin group (2.2 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2); no significant difference was noted in the mean pulmonary artery pressure. The oxygen extraction ratio was higher in the dopamine-nitroglycerin group (0.41 +/- 0.07) compared with the amrinone group (0.34 +/- 0.08). Despite lower platelet counts in the amrinone group, no hemorrhagic complications were seen in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS
With this dosage regimen, amrinone provides a higher cardiac output, more favorable oxygen dynamics, and lower pulmonary vascular resistance than dopamine and nitroglycerin.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.