MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/conl.12783

Медицинская библиотека · Conservation letters · 2021

Measuring the intensity of conflicts in conservation.

Cusack Jeremy J, Bradfer-Lawrence Tom, Baynham-Herd Zachary, Castelló Y Tickell Sofia, Duporge Isla, Hegre Håvard, Moreno Zárate Lara, Naude Vincent, Nijhawan Sahil, Wilson John, Zambrano Cortes Dario Gerardo, Bunnefeld Nils

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Conflicts between the interests of biodiversity conservation and other human activities pose a major threat to natural ecosystems and human well-being, yet few methods exist to quantify their intensity and model their dynamics. We develop a categorization of conflict intensity based on the curve of conflict, a model originally used to track the escalation and deescalation of armed conflicts. Our categorization assigns six intensity levels reflecting the discourse and actions of stakeholders involved in a given conflict, from coexistence or collaboration to physical violence. Using a range of case studies, we demonstrate the value of our approach in quantifying conflict trends, estimating transition probabilities between conflict stages, and modeling conflict intensity as a function of relevant covariates. By taking an evidence-based approach to quantifying stakeholder behavior, the proposed framework allows for a better understanding of the drivers of conservation conflict development across a diverse range of socioecological scenarios.

Для цитирования: Cusack Jeremy J, Bradfer-Lawrence Tom, Baynham-Herd Zachary, Castelló Y Tickell Sofia, Duporge Isla, Hegre Håvard, Moreno Zárate Lara, Naude Vincent, Nijhawan Sahil, Wilson John, Zambrano Cortes Dario Gerardo, Bunnefeld Nils. Measuring the intensity of conflicts in conservation.. Conservation letters. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12783.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.