Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique · 2005
[Assessment of disability and quality of life in patients with cognitive disorders].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rode G, Thomas-Antérion C, Luauté J, Jacquin-Courtois S, Ciancia S, Rossetti Y, Boisson D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify disability, handicap and quality of life questionnaires available for patients with cognitive impairment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature in Medline using the keywords assessment, evaluation, deficiency, disability, disadvantage, handicap, quality of life, scale, index, questionnaire, ICIDH-1, and ICIDH-2, combined with the cognitive deficits dysexecutive syndrome, memory deficits, attention deficits, neglect, apraxia, aphasia, agnosia and mood disorders. We focused on validated scales and distinguished scales dedicated to assess disability, handicap and quality of life.
RESULTS: At the level of disability, global and specific scales are available. Specific scales exist for dysexecutive syndrome, memory deficits, attention deficits, unilateral neglect, aphasia and mood disorders. French adaptations of foreign language tests and original tests developed in French have been validated in these areas. No specific tool is available for isolated apraxia or agnosia. Generic scales and pathology-specific scales (for stroke, traumatic brain injury, and multiple sclerosis) are available for quality of life. For aphasia, specific tools are available for incapacity handicap and quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Previous results show the impact of the ICIDH-1 framework on functional outcome assessment of cognitive impairments. This approach is often limited by the lack of theoretical background and by the difficulty to assess the involvement of environment and anosognosia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature in Medline using the keywords assessment, evaluation, deficiency, disability, disadvantage, handicap, quality of life, scale, index, questionnaire, ICIDH-1, and ICIDH-2, combined with the cognitive deficits dysexecutive syndrome, memory deficits, attention deficits, neglect, apraxia, aphasia, agnosia and mood disorders. We focused on validated scales and distinguished scales dedicated to assess disability, handicap and quality of life.
RESULTS: At the level of disability, global and specific scales are available. Specific scales exist for dysexecutive syndrome, memory deficits, attention deficits, unilateral neglect, aphasia and mood disorders. French adaptations of foreign language tests and original tests developed in French have been validated in these areas. No specific tool is available for isolated apraxia or agnosia. Generic scales and pathology-specific scales (for stroke, traumatic brain injury, and multiple sclerosis) are available for quality of life. For aphasia, specific tools are available for incapacity handicap and quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Previous results show the impact of the ICIDH-1 framework on functional outcome assessment of cognitive impairments. This approach is often limited by the lack of theoretical background and by the difficulty to assess the involvement of environment and anosognosia.