Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
Vascular function in patients with advanced heart failure and continuous-flow or pulsatile ventricular assist devices.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rossi Valentina A, Nebunu Delia, Nägele Matthias P, Barthelmes Jens, Haider Thomas, Laptseva Natallia, Bitos Konstantinos, Kreysing Leonie, Frank Michelle, Enseleit Frank, Wilhelm Markus J, Dzemali Omer, Ruschitzka Frank, Sudano Isabella, Flammer Andreas J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) progress to an advanced stage, which is associated with a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. These patients may be eligible for advanced treatment strategies such as mechanical circulatory support with ventricular assist devices (VAD). Vascular dysfunction is a hallmark of heart failure pathophysiology and prognosis. However, whether and to what degree the hemodynamic benefits of VADs influence vascular function remain unknown.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated endothelial vascular function with flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) and with flicker-light induced retinal vasodilatation (FID). 34 patients with a VAD (age 58 ± 10 years, 85% male, 74% ischemic heart disease, 26 continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD, and 8 pulsatile biventricular (bi)-VAD) were compared to 34 propensity-matched patients (mean age 62 ± 9 years, 68% male, 59% ischemic heart disease) with advanced HF (AdvHF). Endothelial function of larger arteries (FMD) was significantly better in patients after VAD implantation compared to matched AdvHF patients (7.2 ± 4.6% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, p = 0.03), whereas microvascular arteriolar function (FIDart) did not differ (0.99 ± 1.43% vs. 1.1 ± 1.7%, p = 0.78). The arterio-venous ratio (AVR) was higher in the VAD group (0.90 ± 0.06 vs 0.85 ± 0.09, p = 0.01), reflecting wider retinal arteriolar and narrower venular diameters. There was no difference in vascular function between patients with CF-LVAD and pulsatile Bi-VAD.
CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced heart failure, VAD implantation was associated with better endothelial function at the level of large arteries, but not in the microcirculation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated endothelial vascular function with flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) and with flicker-light induced retinal vasodilatation (FID). 34 patients with a VAD (age 58 ± 10 years, 85% male, 74% ischemic heart disease, 26 continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD, and 8 pulsatile biventricular (bi)-VAD) were compared to 34 propensity-matched patients (mean age 62 ± 9 years, 68% male, 59% ischemic heart disease) with advanced HF (AdvHF). Endothelial function of larger arteries (FMD) was significantly better in patients after VAD implantation compared to matched AdvHF patients (7.2 ± 4.6% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, p = 0.03), whereas microvascular arteriolar function (FIDart) did not differ (0.99 ± 1.43% vs. 1.1 ± 1.7%, p = 0.78). The arterio-venous ratio (AVR) was higher in the VAD group (0.90 ± 0.06 vs 0.85 ± 0.09, p = 0.01), reflecting wider retinal arteriolar and narrower venular diameters. There was no difference in vascular function between patients with CF-LVAD and pulsatile Bi-VAD.
CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced heart failure, VAD implantation was associated with better endothelial function at the level of large arteries, but not in the microcirculation.