Urologia internationalis · 2001
The incidence of pharmacologically induced priapism in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of 685 men with erectile dysfunction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Perimenis P, Athanasopoulos A, Geramoutsos I, Barbalias G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of pharmacologically induced priapism in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of erectile dysfunction.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 7 years, 685 men were investigated for erectile failure. They underwent a simple test with vaso-active drugs, and the nonresponders were further investigated. Eventually, 83 men began autoinjections and 45 still continue.
RESULTS: Eight (1.2%) cases of priapism presented during the simple test with vaso-active drugs in these patients, while none occurred during self-injection treatment. Three were prolonged erections induced by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and 5 by papaverine (Pap). Six were treated safely with intracavernosal injection of etilephrine without blood aspiration.
CONCLUSION: Priapism is always a potential phenomenon where no individual, no particular drug and no specific dose are completely safe. It may be caused even with 5 microg of PGE1 or 7.5 mg of Pap. Auto-injection therapy however is a safe kind of treatment in well-experienced patients. Careful regulation of the doses and practice in the use of vaso-active drugs may reduce the priapism rate.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 7 years, 685 men were investigated for erectile failure. They underwent a simple test with vaso-active drugs, and the nonresponders were further investigated. Eventually, 83 men began autoinjections and 45 still continue.
RESULTS: Eight (1.2%) cases of priapism presented during the simple test with vaso-active drugs in these patients, while none occurred during self-injection treatment. Three were prolonged erections induced by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and 5 by papaverine (Pap). Six were treated safely with intracavernosal injection of etilephrine without blood aspiration.
CONCLUSION: Priapism is always a potential phenomenon where no individual, no particular drug and no specific dose are completely safe. It may be caused even with 5 microg of PGE1 or 7.5 mg of Pap. Auto-injection therapy however is a safe kind of treatment in well-experienced patients. Careful regulation of the doses and practice in the use of vaso-active drugs may reduce the priapism rate.