BioFRAM PGx, an Implementation Proposal for Pharmacogenetics in the Spanish National Health System.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arias-Aragón Francisco, Mata-Martín Carmen, Sánchez-Redondo Alba, Novalbos Jesús, Seguido Miguel Ángel, Abad-Santos Francisco, Hernaez Mar, Brunet Mercè, Heredero-Jung David Hansoe, Sota-Pérez Alejandro de la, Isidoro-García María, Gil-Rodriguez Almudena, Barral-Raña Alba, Maroñas Olalla, Pasquini Gladys Guadalupe Olivera, Zucchet Enrique G, Herrero María José, Dodero-Anillo José Manuel, Máñez Alicia Alba, Pedrosa-Martínez María José, Llerena Adrián, On Behalf Of The BioFRAM PGx Consortium
Аннотация
Background/Objectives: Pharmacogenetics (PGx) may improve drug safety and effectiveness, but its integration into routine care remains heterogeneous across the Spanish National Health System (NHS). This article presents BioFRAM PGx, a multicentre implementation framework that defines the methodological and operational basis for subsequent observational validation in cardiovascular and mental-health care settings. Methods: The framework was developed by healthcare centres from eight Spanish Autonomous Communities through a structured review of PharmGKB/ClinPGx clinical annotations, CPIC and DPWG guidelines, and national regulatory resources. Gene-drug pairs were prioritized according to clinical actionability, therapeutic relevance, applicability to the Spanish population, and analytical feasibility. BioFRAM PGx defines a panel of seven pharmacogenes and 35 drugs, standardized genotyping and phenotype-assignment procedures, pharmacovigilance and clinical variables, healthcare-resource measures, and centralized data management. The proposed non-interventional validation phase includes adults receiving at least one selected drug in hospital or primary-care settings, with a minimum six-month follow-up. PGx results are not returned to clinicians and do not modify treatment. Its primary objective is to assess the predictive value of PGx genotyping for adverse drug reactions (ADRs); secondary objectives include ADR incidence and implementation feasibility. Results: The main outputs are the proposed multicentre observational design, the prioritized gene-drug panel, harmonized analytical and pharmacovigilance workflows, standardized data domains, and a centralized data-management strategy. No patient-level clinical, implementation, or economic outcomes are presented. Conclusions: BioFRAM PGx provides a structured multicentre framework for harmonizing pharmacogenetic procedures across the Spanish NHS. Its clinical effectiveness, influence on prescribing, scalability, and economic outcomes remain to be assessed in subsequent studies.