Neurourology and urodynamics · 2009
Urethral retro-resistance pressure: association with established measures of incontinence severity and change after midurethral tape insertion.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roderick Teo, Paul Moran, Christopher Mayne, Douglas Tincello
Аннотация
AIMS: Our study explored the relationship between URP and established measures of incontinence severity. We also report on change in URP after insertion of midurethral tape (MUT).
METHODS: All participants had incontinence secondary to urodynamic stress incontinence only. URP was measured using the Monitorr (Gynecare) device prior to and 3 months after MUT insertion. The following measures of incontinence severity were completed before and 3 months after insertion of MUT: 24-hour pad test; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for evaluating symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence; King's Health Questionnaire for evaluating disease-specific quality of life and a 3-day urinary dairy with episodes of incontinence recorded.
RESULTS: Preoperative URP and measures of incontinence severity were available for 100 women. Mean URP bore no relationship to the severity of urine loss assessed by 24-hour pad loss. There was no correlation between URP and other measures of incontinence severity. Pre and postoperative URP was available in 73 women. Although 84.9% were objectively cure (24-hour pad test of <5 g) after surgery, pre and postoperative URP was not significantly different [62.7 (+/-19.4) cmH(2)O vs. 61.2 (+/-204) cmH(2)O; p = 0.57].
CONCLUSIONS: Urethral retro-resistance pressure is not a useful measure of urethral function.
METHODS: All participants had incontinence secondary to urodynamic stress incontinence only. URP was measured using the Monitorr (Gynecare) device prior to and 3 months after MUT insertion. The following measures of incontinence severity were completed before and 3 months after insertion of MUT: 24-hour pad test; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for evaluating symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence; King's Health Questionnaire for evaluating disease-specific quality of life and a 3-day urinary dairy with episodes of incontinence recorded.
RESULTS: Preoperative URP and measures of incontinence severity were available for 100 women. Mean URP bore no relationship to the severity of urine loss assessed by 24-hour pad loss. There was no correlation between URP and other measures of incontinence severity. Pre and postoperative URP was available in 73 women. Although 84.9% were objectively cure (24-hour pad test of <5 g) after surgery, pre and postoperative URP was not significantly different [62.7 (+/-19.4) cmH(2)O vs. 61.2 (+/-204) cmH(2)O; p = 0.57].
CONCLUSIONS: Urethral retro-resistance pressure is not a useful measure of urethral function.