Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2012
[Study on self-reported halitosis and the associated factors in patients in a periodontal clinic].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Jing, He Lu, Liu Ting-ting
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate self-reported halitosis in patients who visited a periodontal clinic and assess the possible factors associated with genuine halitosis.
METHODS: The subjects included 435 patients who visited periodontal department of Peking University, School and Hospital of Stomatology. All of them were non-smokers. First, the degree of halitosis was estimated by Organoleptic Test. Then, a standardized questionnaire focusing on life style, oral hygiene, medical history, dental condition, self-reported halitosis was completed by all participants. Additionally, tongue coating was evaluated for 312 patients.
RESULTS: 273 of 435 participants had self-reported halitosis. According to Organoleptic Test, 31.2% patients complaining halitosis had actually no malodor while 68.8% had genuine halitosis. There was statistically significant difference of the proportion of patients who were unwilling to mention about halitosis between genuine halitosis group and pseudo-halitosis group (P=0.003). Proportion of patients who had accepted treatment for halitosis was statistically significant higher in pseudo-halitosis group than in genuine halitosis group (P=0.029). Logistic regression analysis showed bleeding on brushing (OR=2.905, P=0.000), area of tongue coating≥2 (OR=2.395, P=0.019), thickness of tongue coating≥2 (OR=3.419, P=0.000) were factors associated with genuine halitosis.
CONCLUSION: Not all self-reported patients actually had malodor, the psychological condition was different between pseudo-halitosis and genuine halitosis patients. Bleeding on brushing, large tongue coating area, thick tongue coating were associated with genuine halitosis.
METHODS: The subjects included 435 patients who visited periodontal department of Peking University, School and Hospital of Stomatology. All of them were non-smokers. First, the degree of halitosis was estimated by Organoleptic Test. Then, a standardized questionnaire focusing on life style, oral hygiene, medical history, dental condition, self-reported halitosis was completed by all participants. Additionally, tongue coating was evaluated for 312 patients.
RESULTS: 273 of 435 participants had self-reported halitosis. According to Organoleptic Test, 31.2% patients complaining halitosis had actually no malodor while 68.8% had genuine halitosis. There was statistically significant difference of the proportion of patients who were unwilling to mention about halitosis between genuine halitosis group and pseudo-halitosis group (P=0.003). Proportion of patients who had accepted treatment for halitosis was statistically significant higher in pseudo-halitosis group than in genuine halitosis group (P=0.029). Logistic regression analysis showed bleeding on brushing (OR=2.905, P=0.000), area of tongue coating≥2 (OR=2.395, P=0.019), thickness of tongue coating≥2 (OR=3.419, P=0.000) were factors associated with genuine halitosis.
CONCLUSION: Not all self-reported patients actually had malodor, the psychological condition was different between pseudo-halitosis and genuine halitosis patients. Bleeding on brushing, large tongue coating area, thick tongue coating were associated with genuine halitosis.