Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2015
Novel mutation in the BMPR1B gene (R486L) in a Polish family and further delineation of the phenotypic features of BMPR1B-related brachydactyly.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Badura-Stronka Magdalena, Mróz Dariusz, Beighton Peter, Łukawiecki Sebastian, Wicher Katarzyna, Latos-Bieleńska Anna, Kozłowski Kazimierz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lehmann et al., [2003, 2006] have documented two different substitutions at position 486 of the BMPR1B gene which resulted in a phenotype of brachydactyly A2 [MIM 112600] or brachydactyly C with symphalangism [MIM 113100].
METHODS: In this article we report a family of Polish extraction with a novel mutation: c.1457G>T (R486L) which segregated with a complex brachydactyly. Clinical and radiological data are presented and details of previously reported patients with a pathogenic change of an amino acid at position 486 of the BMPR1B gene are summarized.
CONCLUSION: Our data extends the previously known mutational and radiological spectrum associated with mutations in the BMPR1B gene and confirms the existence of a universal hotspot in the BMPR1B gene in this distinctive autosomal dominant brachydactyly disorder. It is of interest that an affected female in the Polish family had a severe congenital malformation of the venous system in addition to her digital anomalies. This observation raises the possibility of disturbance of embryonic angiogenesis by specific mutations in BMPR1B.
METHODS: In this article we report a family of Polish extraction with a novel mutation: c.1457G>T (R486L) which segregated with a complex brachydactyly. Clinical and radiological data are presented and details of previously reported patients with a pathogenic change of an amino acid at position 486 of the BMPR1B gene are summarized.
CONCLUSION: Our data extends the previously known mutational and radiological spectrum associated with mutations in the BMPR1B gene and confirms the existence of a universal hotspot in the BMPR1B gene in this distinctive autosomal dominant brachydactyly disorder. It is of interest that an affected female in the Polish family had a severe congenital malformation of the venous system in addition to her digital anomalies. This observation raises the possibility of disturbance of embryonic angiogenesis by specific mutations in BMPR1B.