The Journal of arthroplasty · 2018
Relationship Between Coronal Alignment and Rotational Profile of Lower Extremity in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Moon Jong, Jeong Hyeon Jang, Kang Seung-Baik, Chang Chong Bum, Yoon Chan, Shin Joung Youp
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed at determining whether the coronal alignment of lower extremity was related to rotational geometry of distal femur, femoral anteversion, and tibial torsion in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
METHODS: A total of 422 lower extremities were divided into 3 groups according to the coronal alignment: valgus (n = 31), neutral (n = 78), and varus group (n = 313). Condylar twisting angle was measured to determine rotational geometry of distal femur as the angle between the clinical transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar line. Femoral anteversion was assessed using the angle between a line intersecting the femoral neck and the posterior condylar line (pFeAV) and the angle between the same line and transepicondylar axis that is not affected by posterior condylar variations (tFeAV). Tibial torsion was evaluated by measuring the angle between the posterior condyles of the proximal tibia and the transmalleolar axis.
RESULTS: As the coronal alignment changed from varus to valgus, the condylar twisting angle increased (r = 0.253, P < .001; 6.6° in varus, 7.4° in neutral, and 10.2° in valgus group). Although the pFeAV also increased (r = 0.145, P = .003), the tFeAV did not change significantly (P = .218). Mean tFeAV was 4.3° in varus, 4.7° in neutral, and 6.5° in valgus group. In contrast, as the coronal alignment changed from varus to valgus, the external tibial torsion increased (r = 0.374, P < .001; 22.6° in varus, 26.3° in neutral, and 32.6° in valgus group).
CONCLUSION: The change patterns of the rotational profiles of the lower extremity according to the coronal alignment should be considered in order to obtain satisfactory rotational alignment after TKA.
METHODS: A total of 422 lower extremities were divided into 3 groups according to the coronal alignment: valgus (n = 31), neutral (n = 78), and varus group (n = 313). Condylar twisting angle was measured to determine rotational geometry of distal femur as the angle between the clinical transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar line. Femoral anteversion was assessed using the angle between a line intersecting the femoral neck and the posterior condylar line (pFeAV) and the angle between the same line and transepicondylar axis that is not affected by posterior condylar variations (tFeAV). Tibial torsion was evaluated by measuring the angle between the posterior condyles of the proximal tibia and the transmalleolar axis.
RESULTS: As the coronal alignment changed from varus to valgus, the condylar twisting angle increased (r = 0.253, P < .001; 6.6° in varus, 7.4° in neutral, and 10.2° in valgus group). Although the pFeAV also increased (r = 0.145, P = .003), the tFeAV did not change significantly (P = .218). Mean tFeAV was 4.3° in varus, 4.7° in neutral, and 6.5° in valgus group. In contrast, as the coronal alignment changed from varus to valgus, the external tibial torsion increased (r = 0.374, P < .001; 22.6° in varus, 26.3° in neutral, and 32.6° in valgus group).
CONCLUSION: The change patterns of the rotational profiles of the lower extremity according to the coronal alignment should be considered in order to obtain satisfactory rotational alignment after TKA.