American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1993
Evaluation of multiple-marker screening for Down syndrome in a statewide population.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wenstrom K D, Williamson R A, Grant S S, Hudson J D, Getchell J P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate our experience with a statewide, multiple-marker Down syndrome screening program.
STUDY DESIGN: The results of 18,712 screening tests performed from July 1, 1991, to Oct. 31, 1992, were reviewed. Amniocentesis and aneuploidy detection rates were compared with the experience of a previous year (1989-1990) in which material serum alpha-fetoprotein was used for detection of Down syndrome.
RESULTS: Positive screening tests (Down syndrome risk > or = 1/190) occurred in 665 of 18,712 (3.5%) patients; 516 of 665 (78%) patients accepted amniocentesis. Fifteen aneuploidies were identified: 12 trisomy 21, one trisomy 18, one trisomy 13, and one 48,XXXY. The overall detection rate was one in 34 amniocenteses performed; for trisomy 21 it was one in 43. In a previous year in which maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein alone was used, 3.6% had positive screening tests (Down syndrome risk > or = 270); the detection rate for all aneuploidies was one in 57 amniocenteses, and for trisomy 21 it was one in 114. The expanded maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein test was well accepted by clinicians, with 36% of gravid state residents undergoing screening.
CONCLUSION: The multiple marker test is a good screening tool and is superior to material serum alpha-fetoprotein alone.
STUDY DESIGN: The results of 18,712 screening tests performed from July 1, 1991, to Oct. 31, 1992, were reviewed. Amniocentesis and aneuploidy detection rates were compared with the experience of a previous year (1989-1990) in which material serum alpha-fetoprotein was used for detection of Down syndrome.
RESULTS: Positive screening tests (Down syndrome risk > or = 1/190) occurred in 665 of 18,712 (3.5%) patients; 516 of 665 (78%) patients accepted amniocentesis. Fifteen aneuploidies were identified: 12 trisomy 21, one trisomy 18, one trisomy 13, and one 48,XXXY. The overall detection rate was one in 34 amniocenteses performed; for trisomy 21 it was one in 43. In a previous year in which maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein alone was used, 3.6% had positive screening tests (Down syndrome risk > or = 270); the detection rate for all aneuploidies was one in 57 amniocenteses, and for trisomy 21 it was one in 114. The expanded maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein test was well accepted by clinicians, with 36% of gravid state residents undergoing screening.
CONCLUSION: The multiple marker test is a good screening tool and is superior to material serum alpha-fetoprotein alone.