Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 1997
Timolol gel versus acetazolamide in the prophylaxis of ocular hypertension after phacoemulsification.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kanellopoulos A J, Perry H D, Donnenfeld E D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after administration of acetazolamide and timolol following phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.
SETTING: Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, USA.
METHODS: Sixty patients were included in a prospective, randomized, masked trial. The patients received either two doses of oral, sustained-release acetazolamide (Diamox Sequels) or a single dose of topical timolol 0.5% gel (Timoptic XE). Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative IOP was 16.4 mm Hg. One day postoperatively, it was 19.5 mm Hg in the oral acetazolamide group and 15.9 mm Hg in the timolol gel group. One patient in the acetazolamide group developed significant adverse reactions.
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of topical timolol 0.5% gel for viscoelastic-induced ocular hypertension after cataract extraction appears to offer better IOP control than oral acetazolamide and has potentially fewer adverse systemic effects.
SETTING: Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, USA.
METHODS: Sixty patients were included in a prospective, randomized, masked trial. The patients received either two doses of oral, sustained-release acetazolamide (Diamox Sequels) or a single dose of topical timolol 0.5% gel (Timoptic XE). Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative IOP was 16.4 mm Hg. One day postoperatively, it was 19.5 mm Hg in the oral acetazolamide group and 15.9 mm Hg in the timolol gel group. One patient in the acetazolamide group developed significant adverse reactions.
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of topical timolol 0.5% gel for viscoelastic-induced ocular hypertension after cataract extraction appears to offer better IOP control than oral acetazolamide and has potentially fewer adverse systemic effects.