MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf00432219

Медицинская библиотека · Psychopharmacology · 1985

The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

Chait L D, Uhlenhuth E H, Johanson C E

Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Seventeen normal, healthy adults were trained to discriminate between orally administered d-amphetamine (AMP; 10 mg) and placebo. Standardized subjective effects questionnaires were used to examine the relationship between the subjective and discriminative stimulus effects of AMP. Seven of the subjects were able to learn the discrimination reliably. These seven "discriminators" did not differ from the ten "nondiscriminators" in their subjective ratings of mood in the absence of drug. Discriminators were generally more sensitive than nondiscriminators to the subjective effects of AMP, although this difference in sensitivity reached statistical significance only for ratings of "hungry." Stimulus substitution was tested in the the discriminators with other doses of AMP (2.5 and 5 mg) and with 10 mg diazepam. The discriminative stimulus properties of AMP were dose-dependent, with 5 mg being the threshold dose. In five of the seven subjects the discriminative stimulus properties of diazepam did not substitute for those of AMP. The results demonstrate that the experimental paradigm can be used successfully to study the discriminative stimulus properties of drugs directly in humans.

Для цитирования: Chait L D, Uhlenhuth E H, Johanson C E. The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.. Psychopharmacology. 1985. DOI: 10.1007/bf00432219.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.