MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00546.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of dental hygiene · 2012

The effect of mouthrinses on oral malodor: a systematic review.

Blom T, Slot D E, Quirynen M, Van der Weijden G A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature regarding the impact of mouthrinses on oral malodor and present evidence for the treatment effects of mouthrinses on oral malodor.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

PubMed-MEDLINE, the Cochrane-CENTRAL and EMBASE were searched through February 10, 2012 to identify appropriate studies. Volatile sulphur compound measurements, organoleptic measurements and tongue coating were selected as outcome variables. SEARCH

RESULTS

The independent screenings of 333 unique titles and paper abstracts revealed 12 publications (12 experiments) that met the eligibility criteria. Means and standard deviations were extracted. The results were separated into short-term (<3 weeks) and longer-term (≥3 weeks) studies.

CONCLUSION

In this review, nearly all mouthwashes with active ingredients had beneficial effects in reducing oral malodor in both short- and longer-term studies. The most compelling evidence was provided for chlorhexidine mouthwashes, and those that contained a combination of cetyl pyridinum chloride and zinc provided the best evidence profile on oral malodor. Little data with respect to tongue coating were available, and none of the studies showed a beneficial effect for this parameter.

Для цитирования: Blom T, Slot D E, Quirynen M, Van der Weijden G A. The effect of mouthrinses on oral malodor: a systematic review.. International journal of dental hygiene. 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00546.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.