MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jcla.22890

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019

PCR detection for syphilis diagnosis: Status and prospects.

Zhou Chenglong, Zhang Xiaohong, Zhang Wei, Duan Junxia, Zhao Feijun

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Syphilis, a re-emerging public health problem worldwide caused by Treponema pallidum subsp pallidum (T. pallidum), usually induces systemic and chronic inflammation in hosts who do not receive timely therapy after exposing to high-risk factors such as leprous sexual contact. Before the treatment, rapid and accurate detection of syphilis is essential. However, the existing detection methods, which focus on the treponemal or non-treponemal antibody test, both have inherent limitations. For instance, both of them cannot distinguish the stage and severity of syphilis. Non-treponemal test such as RPR, which is generally deemed to be used for assessing treatment response, is influenced by biological false positives. Therefore, it is imperative to seek out a new and effective diagnostic test. With recent advancements in molecular biology and whole-genome sequencing, the molecular diagnosis has increased in popularity, especially the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Here, we firstly present a mini-review on the research of PCR detection methods used for syphilis diagnosis over the past decade, and we then compare these methodologies to assess their potential and the challenges faced. This information can provide a fresh perspective to help researchers address the current challenges.

Для цитирования: Zhou Chenglong, Zhang Xiaohong, Zhang Wei, Duan Junxia, Zhao Feijun. PCR detection for syphilis diagnosis: Status and prospects.. Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22890.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.