Acta tropica · 2021
Noninvasive predictors of esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nardelli Mateus Jorge, Veiga Zulane da Silva Tavares, Faria Luciana Costa, Pereira Gustavo Henrique Santos, da Silva Catherine Ferreira, Barbosa Fernanda Aziz, Fernandes Flávia Ferreira, Perez Renata de Mello, Villela-Nogueira Cristiane Alves, Couto Claudia Alves
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: No previous study have evaluated transient elastography for predicting esophageal varices in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.
AIM: To investigate noninvasive methods of predicting esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni.
METHODS: Cross-sectional multicentric study included 51 patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Patients underwent ultrasonography-dopplerfluxometry, upper endoscopy, complete blood cell count and transient elastography (Fibroscan®) for liver and spleen stiffness measurement (LSM and SSM). Noninvasive scores previously established for cirrhotic population were studied: platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (PSR), LSM-spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (LSPS) and varices risk score (VRS). We proposed a version of LSPS and VRS by replacing LSM with SSM and named them SSPS and modified-VRS, respectively.
RESULTS: Esophageal varices were detected in 42 (82.4%) subjects. Individuals with varices presented higher SSM (73.5 vs 36.3 Kpa, p = 0.001), splenic vein diameter (10.8 vs 8.0 mm, p = 0.017), SSPS (18.7 vs 6.7, p = 0.003) and modified-VRS (4.0 vs 1.4, p = 0.013), besides lower PSR (332 vs 542, p = 0.038), than those without varices. SSPS was independently associated with varices presence (OR=1.19, 95%CI 1.03-1.37, p = 0.020) after multivariate analysis. In a model excluding noninvasive scores, SSM was independently associated with varices diagnosis (OR=1.09, 95%CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.004). AUROC was 0.856 (95%CI 0.752-0.961, p = 0.001) for SSM and 0.816 (95%CI 0.699-0.932, p = 0.003) for SSPS (p = 0.551).
CONCLUSIONS: Spleen-related variables were predictors of esophageal varices: SSM, splenic vein diameter, SSPS, modified-VRS and PSR. Multivariate models indicated that SSM and SSPS are useful tools for predicting varices in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension by hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and may be used in clinical practice.
AIM: To investigate noninvasive methods of predicting esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni.
METHODS: Cross-sectional multicentric study included 51 patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Patients underwent ultrasonography-dopplerfluxometry, upper endoscopy, complete blood cell count and transient elastography (Fibroscan®) for liver and spleen stiffness measurement (LSM and SSM). Noninvasive scores previously established for cirrhotic population were studied: platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (PSR), LSM-spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (LSPS) and varices risk score (VRS). We proposed a version of LSPS and VRS by replacing LSM with SSM and named them SSPS and modified-VRS, respectively.
RESULTS: Esophageal varices were detected in 42 (82.4%) subjects. Individuals with varices presented higher SSM (73.5 vs 36.3 Kpa, p = 0.001), splenic vein diameter (10.8 vs 8.0 mm, p = 0.017), SSPS (18.7 vs 6.7, p = 0.003) and modified-VRS (4.0 vs 1.4, p = 0.013), besides lower PSR (332 vs 542, p = 0.038), than those without varices. SSPS was independently associated with varices presence (OR=1.19, 95%CI 1.03-1.37, p = 0.020) after multivariate analysis. In a model excluding noninvasive scores, SSM was independently associated with varices diagnosis (OR=1.09, 95%CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.004). AUROC was 0.856 (95%CI 0.752-0.961, p = 0.001) for SSM and 0.816 (95%CI 0.699-0.932, p = 0.003) for SSPS (p = 0.551).
CONCLUSIONS: Spleen-related variables were predictors of esophageal varices: SSM, splenic vein diameter, SSPS, modified-VRS and PSR. Multivariate models indicated that SSM and SSPS are useful tools for predicting varices in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension by hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and may be used in clinical practice.