American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2000
Determination of amniotic fluid volume in twin pregnancies: ultrasonographic evaluation versus operator estimation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Magann E F, Chauhan S P, Whitworth N S, Anfanger P, Rinehart B K, Morrison J C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the accuracy of amniotic fluid volume estimation (visually) in diamniotic twin pregnancy versus ultrasonography techniques.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study the volume of each sac in 23 sets of diamniotic twin pregnancies was subjectively and objectively estimated by a second-year obstetric resident, nurse sonographer, maternal-fetal medicine fellow, and maternal-fetal medicine staff. The actual volume was confirmed by amniocentesis and a dye-dilution technique.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the total number of correct estimates of volume by level of operator experience (P =.98), ultrasonography technique (P =.87), or combined subjective versus objective correct estimates (P =.87). Identification of low volume was not different among the four evaluators (P =.48), but the percentage of correct estimates was poor (7%-29%). The 2-diameter pocket was a better predictor of oligohydramnios (57%) than the amniotic fluid index or the largest vertical pocket (12.5%; P =.002).
CONCLUSION: The extremes of volume (low or high) are poorly identified by the subjective or objective assessment of volume.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study the volume of each sac in 23 sets of diamniotic twin pregnancies was subjectively and objectively estimated by a second-year obstetric resident, nurse sonographer, maternal-fetal medicine fellow, and maternal-fetal medicine staff. The actual volume was confirmed by amniocentesis and a dye-dilution technique.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the total number of correct estimates of volume by level of operator experience (P =.98), ultrasonography technique (P =.87), or combined subjective versus objective correct estimates (P =.87). Identification of low volume was not different among the four evaluators (P =.48), but the percentage of correct estimates was poor (7%-29%). The 2-diameter pocket was a better predictor of oligohydramnios (57%) than the amniotic fluid index or the largest vertical pocket (12.5%; P =.002).
CONCLUSION: The extremes of volume (low or high) are poorly identified by the subjective or objective assessment of volume.