Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Macrolide in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shu Fu, Li Chan-Xiu, Zhang Feng, Peng Mingwei, Shi Lei, Li Linglong, Xiong Juan, Mu Zengyi, Wang Yaping, Mao Dehong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of macrolide antibiotics therapy in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) receiving endoscopic sinus surgery.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library.
REVIEW METHODS: The electronic databases were comprehensively searched on June 2, 2022, for randomized controlled trials on macrolide antibiotics in the treatment of patients undergoing CRS endoscopic surgery. The primary outcome measures were the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) score. The secondary outcome measures were the nasal endoscopy score (NES), the sinus computed tomography score, and adverse events.
RESULTS: A total of 8 studies were included, involving 606 patients who used macrolide for a long time. Meta-analysis showed that no significant difference was observed in SNOT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.38 to 0.13, I2 = 0%) and VAS (SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.88 to 0.68, I2 = 81%) between the macrolide and placebo groups. However, macrolide outperformed the placebo in improving NES (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.03, I2 = 21%). The use of macrolide did not increase the incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Long-term use of macrolide after CRS surgery may not significantly improve the quality of life and disease severity of the patients but may play a role in improving postoperative NES in patients with CRS. There is still no sufficient evidence to determine whether the disease phenotype of CRS or the patient's race will affect the efficacy of long-term use of macrolide after CRS.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library.
REVIEW METHODS: The electronic databases were comprehensively searched on June 2, 2022, for randomized controlled trials on macrolide antibiotics in the treatment of patients undergoing CRS endoscopic surgery. The primary outcome measures were the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) score. The secondary outcome measures were the nasal endoscopy score (NES), the sinus computed tomography score, and adverse events.
RESULTS: A total of 8 studies were included, involving 606 patients who used macrolide for a long time. Meta-analysis showed that no significant difference was observed in SNOT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.38 to 0.13, I2 = 0%) and VAS (SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.88 to 0.68, I2 = 81%) between the macrolide and placebo groups. However, macrolide outperformed the placebo in improving NES (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.03, I2 = 21%). The use of macrolide did not increase the incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Long-term use of macrolide after CRS surgery may not significantly improve the quality of life and disease severity of the patients but may play a role in improving postoperative NES in patients with CRS. There is still no sufficient evidence to determine whether the disease phenotype of CRS or the patient's race will affect the efficacy of long-term use of macrolide after CRS.