Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
Evaluation of Preexposure (PrEP) Eligibility Criteria, Using Sexually Transmissible Infections as Markers of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Risk at Enrollment in PrEPX, a Large Australian HIV PrEP Trial.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cornelisse Vincent J, Fairley Christopher K, Stoove Mark, Asselin Jason, Chow Eric P F, Price Brian, Roth Norman J, Willcox Jeff, Tee B K, Penn Matthew, Chang Christina C, Armishaw Judith, Forgan-Smith George, Wright Edwina J, PrEPX Study Team
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To determine participants' human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, the Australian preexposure prophylaxis (PreEPX) trial used 6 eligibility criteria derived from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PrEP guidelines. Participants who fulfilled no eligibility criteria could be enrolled if clinically assessed to need PrEP. This study evaluated whether PREPX eligibility criteria correlated with biological HIV risk markers-namely, syphilis, anorectal chlamydia, or anorectal gonorrhea (sexually transmitted infections [STIs]).
METHODS: We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to assess whether eligibility criteria predicted STI diagnoses at enrollment.
RESULTS: We included 1774 participants, of whom 10.2% tested positive for STIs. Eligibility criteria predicted STI diagnoses as follows: (1) aOR 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.4) for condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) with an HIV-positive regular sexual partner (RSP) with detectable viral load; (2) aOR 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) for receptive CLAI with casual sexual partners; (3) aOR 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) for previous STIs; (4) aOR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4-3.0) for methamphetamine use; (5) aOR 0.8 (95% CI, .6-1.1) for unsuccessful condom use; and (6) aOR 1.0 (95% CI, .7-1.4) for insertive CLAI when uncircumcised. Of participants enrolled outside eligibility criteria, 7.1% had STIs.
CONCLUSIONS: Eligibility criteria 1-4 predicted diagnoses of STIs, but eligibility criteria 5 and 6 did not. Our findings support the use of PrEP eligibility criteria recommended in current guidelines. Participants enrolled outside the eligibility criteria had substantial prevalence of STIs, suggesting that people who request PrEP but do not fulfill eligibility criteria may nonetheless need PrEP.
METHODS: We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to assess whether eligibility criteria predicted STI diagnoses at enrollment.
RESULTS: We included 1774 participants, of whom 10.2% tested positive for STIs. Eligibility criteria predicted STI diagnoses as follows: (1) aOR 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.4) for condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) with an HIV-positive regular sexual partner (RSP) with detectable viral load; (2) aOR 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) for receptive CLAI with casual sexual partners; (3) aOR 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) for previous STIs; (4) aOR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4-3.0) for methamphetamine use; (5) aOR 0.8 (95% CI, .6-1.1) for unsuccessful condom use; and (6) aOR 1.0 (95% CI, .7-1.4) for insertive CLAI when uncircumcised. Of participants enrolled outside eligibility criteria, 7.1% had STIs.
CONCLUSIONS: Eligibility criteria 1-4 predicted diagnoses of STIs, but eligibility criteria 5 and 6 did not. Our findings support the use of PrEP eligibility criteria recommended in current guidelines. Participants enrolled outside the eligibility criteria had substantial prevalence of STIs, suggesting that people who request PrEP but do not fulfill eligibility criteria may nonetheless need PrEP.