MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5493-7

Медицинская библиотека · BMC public health · 2018

The value of program science to optimize knowledge brokering on infectious diseases for public health.

Becker Marissa, Haworth-Brockman Margaret, Keynan Yoav

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Knowledge translation (KT) and related terms have variously been defined as process and as products. In this paper we contribute to debates on effective KT, specifically knowledge brokering, by describing an adaptation of Program Science that aligns with the real-world of public health activities. We describe an adaptation of the Program Science framework to our knowledge translation and brokering planning and projects at the National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases. The systematic approach allows for layering of knowledge year to year and translating knowledge from one infectious disease content area to another. Using a recent forum on syphilis outbreaks as an example, we also demonstrate the value of using Program Science to shape the design and delivery of the knowledge brokering event.

CONCLUSION

The use of scientific knowledge to improve public health program design, implementation and evaluation forms the basis for the program science framework. Providing the right public health information to the right audience at the right time can foster long-term outcomes of networks and new partnerships which can potentially improve delivery of public health services.

Для цитирования: Becker Marissa, Haworth-Brockman Margaret, Keynan Yoav. The value of program science to optimize knowledge brokering on infectious diseases for public health.. BMC public health. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5493-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.