Der Anaesthesist · 1998
[Anesthesia for cesarean section in Germany. A survey].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meuser T, Eichler F, Grond S, Winkler B, Lehmann K A
Аннотация
AIM OF STUDY: Goal of this survey is to give an overview of anaesthesia for caesarean section in Germany.
METHOD: In 1994 and 1995, we sent a questionnaire to the chief-anaesthetists of all German hospitals with departments of gynaecology/obstetrics to find out the routine anaesthetic procedures for caesarean section.
RESULTS: We obtained data from 409 hospitals (response rate 46.4%) with 321,816 births--50,123 of which were sections (mean caesarean section rate 16.6%). The mean general anaesthesia rate for elective caesarean sections was 66.5%, for non-elective sections 90.8%. The mean epidural anaesthesia rate for caesarean section was 22.6% and the mean spinal anaesthesia rate was 9.8%. For general anaesthesia most hospitals used antacids and/or histamine2-receptor antagonists (64.6% of responding hospitals). Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous barbiturates (82%), succinylcholine for intubation (98.2%) and no opioids before clamping of the cord (94.8%). For regional anaesthesia bupivacaine was the most common local anaesthetic (spinal 84.0%, epidural 96.8%). Opioids were added to local anaesthetics for epidural anaesthesia at 21.4% of the hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: General anaesthesia is the commonest practice for caesarean sections at German hospitals. Nowadays regional anaesthesia gains more importance compared to previous German surveys and in agreement with foreign data.
METHOD: In 1994 and 1995, we sent a questionnaire to the chief-anaesthetists of all German hospitals with departments of gynaecology/obstetrics to find out the routine anaesthetic procedures for caesarean section.
RESULTS: We obtained data from 409 hospitals (response rate 46.4%) with 321,816 births--50,123 of which were sections (mean caesarean section rate 16.6%). The mean general anaesthesia rate for elective caesarean sections was 66.5%, for non-elective sections 90.8%. The mean epidural anaesthesia rate for caesarean section was 22.6% and the mean spinal anaesthesia rate was 9.8%. For general anaesthesia most hospitals used antacids and/or histamine2-receptor antagonists (64.6% of responding hospitals). Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous barbiturates (82%), succinylcholine for intubation (98.2%) and no opioids before clamping of the cord (94.8%). For regional anaesthesia bupivacaine was the most common local anaesthetic (spinal 84.0%, epidural 96.8%). Opioids were added to local anaesthetics for epidural anaesthesia at 21.4% of the hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: General anaesthesia is the commonest practice for caesarean sections at German hospitals. Nowadays regional anaesthesia gains more importance compared to previous German surveys and in agreement with foreign data.