MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 2018

[Sexual and psychological well-being after female genital mutilation: a narrative systematic review].

van Moorst Bianca R, das Dores Simone, van Lunsen Rik H W, Laan Ellen T M

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A literature analysis on the effects of female genital mutilation (FGM) on sexual and psychological well-being.

DESIGN

Narrative systematic review.

METHOD: In March 2016 we performed a search for relevant literature in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Inclusion criteria were studies (a) of women who had undergone FGM and with a control group of women who had not undergone FGM; (b) published since 2010; (c) in Dutch, English, French or German; and (d) in which use was made of sexological and/or psychological questionnaires.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies from African, Arabic or European countries. In 3 studies psychological well-being was assessed, in 5 studies sexual well-being, and in 6 studies both were assessed. Women with FGM reported more symptoms of post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. FGM had negative effects on self-confidence, quality of life and marital satisfaction. Women with FGM were less satisfied with their sex life. They reported less sexual desire, less arousal and lubrication and fewer orgasms and more often had dyspareunia.

CONCLUSION

Women with FGM have an increased risk of reduced psychological and sexual well-being.

Для цитирования: van Moorst Bianca R, das Dores Simone, van Lunsen Rik H W, Laan Ellen T M. [Sexual and psychological well-being after female genital mutilation: a narrative systematic review].. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.