Journal of thoracic disease · 2023
Open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm-a narrative review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harik Lamia, Lau Christopher
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality when left untreated, yet their repair has been associated considerable risk as well. We aim to present a review of the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, natural history, management strategies, and current literature on open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
METHODS: A narrative review using current search of the most recent literature on this topic.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Indication for surgical repair includes symptomatic aneurysms and those at a size or growth threshold. Open repair is the gold standard for surgical management of TAAA and remains so, however, endovascular repair has an increasingly broad applicability, and technology has correspondingly improved in the two decades since its introduction to clinical practice. Reported contemporary operative mortality has ranged from less than 5% to over 20%. The primary adverse complication of open and endovascular repair is ischemic injury, including renal injury, with reported incidence ranging from 2.8-12.5% in contemporary series, and spinal cord injury, with reported incidence ranging from 2.5% to 7.3% in contemporary series. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage has been shown to be the best-proven mechanism to date to prevent spinal cord injury in both open and endovascular repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is associated with a higher reintervention rate than open repair. Surgeon and center volume and expertise are related to clinical outcomes and should be taken into consideration when deciding on surgical repair.
METHODS: A narrative review using current search of the most recent literature on this topic.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Indication for surgical repair includes symptomatic aneurysms and those at a size or growth threshold. Open repair is the gold standard for surgical management of TAAA and remains so, however, endovascular repair has an increasingly broad applicability, and technology has correspondingly improved in the two decades since its introduction to clinical practice. Reported contemporary operative mortality has ranged from less than 5% to over 20%. The primary adverse complication of open and endovascular repair is ischemic injury, including renal injury, with reported incidence ranging from 2.8-12.5% in contemporary series, and spinal cord injury, with reported incidence ranging from 2.5% to 7.3% in contemporary series. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage has been shown to be the best-proven mechanism to date to prevent spinal cord injury in both open and endovascular repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is associated with a higher reintervention rate than open repair. Surgeon and center volume and expertise are related to clinical outcomes and should be taken into consideration when deciding on surgical repair.