The Journal of heart valve disease · 2009
Anti-HLA antibodies and pulmonary valve allograft function after the Ross procedure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bechtel J F Matthias, Marquardt Anja, Müller-Steinhardt Michael, Hankel Thorsten, Stierle Ulrich, Sievers Hans-Hinrich
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Rejection is a plausible cause of failure of allograft valves, but has not been demonstrated unequivocally in humans. A cross-sectional study has been conducted on the frequency of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in order to identify any correlation with allograft function in adult patients, following the Ross procedure.
METHODS: Anti-HLA antibodies were determined during regular follow up (median 1.1 years postoperatively) in a random sample of 197 patients (151 males, 46 females; mean age 46 +/- 13 years). Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) were determined by cytotoxicity testing; anti-HLA class 2 antibodies (HLA2AB) were determined by ELISA in a subgroup of 94 patients. Echocardiographic examinations were performed during the first visit and at a median of 6.8 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: The prevalence of positive antibody tests was 47% for PRA and 52% for HLA2AB. A slight deterioration of allograft valve function occurred between the two examinations (median maximal pressure gradient increased from 9 mmHg to 13 mmHg, p < 0.001; median degree of regurgitation increased from zero to trivial, p = 0.020). The degree of regurgitation was slightly, but significantly, higher in PRA-positive patients at both examinations (p = 0.008 and p = 0.038). No relationship was observed between PRA status and pressure gradients, nor between HLA2AB status and allograft valve function. Neither were any other risk factors for allograft valve deterioration identified.
CONCLUSION: Subtle, clinically irrelevant and temporally stable differences with regard to regurgitation across the allograft were observed between PRA-positive and -negative patients. These findings neither proved nor disproved rejection, but rather suggested that a slow deterioration of allograft valve function was complex, and most likely multifactorial.
METHODS: Anti-HLA antibodies were determined during regular follow up (median 1.1 years postoperatively) in a random sample of 197 patients (151 males, 46 females; mean age 46 +/- 13 years). Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) were determined by cytotoxicity testing; anti-HLA class 2 antibodies (HLA2AB) were determined by ELISA in a subgroup of 94 patients. Echocardiographic examinations were performed during the first visit and at a median of 6.8 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: The prevalence of positive antibody tests was 47% for PRA and 52% for HLA2AB. A slight deterioration of allograft valve function occurred between the two examinations (median maximal pressure gradient increased from 9 mmHg to 13 mmHg, p < 0.001; median degree of regurgitation increased from zero to trivial, p = 0.020). The degree of regurgitation was slightly, but significantly, higher in PRA-positive patients at both examinations (p = 0.008 and p = 0.038). No relationship was observed between PRA status and pressure gradients, nor between HLA2AB status and allograft valve function. Neither were any other risk factors for allograft valve deterioration identified.
CONCLUSION: Subtle, clinically irrelevant and temporally stable differences with regard to regurgitation across the allograft were observed between PRA-positive and -negative patients. These findings neither proved nor disproved rejection, but rather suggested that a slow deterioration of allograft valve function was complex, and most likely multifactorial.