Second operation for repair of biliary atresia.

In our experience with biliary atresia, there are few cases amenable to reoperation for recurrent jaundice. All authors would agree that specific conditions such as complete bile flow recovery from the first operation followed by early recurrence should be an unquestionable case for revision of the anastomosis, inasmuch as no biologic signs of ongoing cholangitis can be traced. The same decision would apply to the problem of bile leakage after hepatoportocholecystostomy. In other cases, however, one should be aware that these reoperations expose the child to ascitis, poor healing of the abdominal wound, liver failure, and also bring with the decision to reoperate undue hopes to the parents of the child. Moreover, if the child should be a future candidate for liver transplantation, it may be wiser to avoid useless laparotomies and abdominal dissections that are known to complicate the task of hepatectomy.