Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023
Use of lung ultrasound in school-aged children with wheezing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Attanasi Marina, Sferrazza Papa Simone, Porreca Annamaria, Sferrazza Papa Giuseppe F, Di Filippo Paola, Piloni Francesca, Dodi Giulia, Sansone Francesco, Di Pillo Sabrina, Chiarelli Francesco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is limited information available on fast and safe bedside tools that could help clinicians establish whether the pathological process underlying cases of wheezing is due to asthmatic exacerbation, asthmatic bronchitis, or pneumonia. The study's aim was to characterize Lung Ultrasound (LUS) in school-aged children with wheezing and evaluate its use for their follow-up treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 68 consecutive outpatients (mean age 9.9 years) with wheezing and suggestive signs of an acute respiratory infection. An expert sonographer, blinded to all subject characteristics, clinical course, and the study pediatrician's diagnosis, performed an LUS after spirometry and before BDT. The severity of acute respiratory symptoms was determined using the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score.
RESULTS: The LUS was positive in 38.2% (26/68) of patients [12 (46.1%) with multiple B-lines, 24 (92.3%) with consolidation, and 22 (84.6%) with pleural abnormalities]. In patients with pneumonia, asthmatic bronchitis, and asthma, the percentages of those patients with a positive LUS were 100%, 57.7%, and 0%, respectively. Of note, patients with a positive LUS were associated with an increased need for hospital admission (30.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.001), administration of oxygen therapy (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.009), oral corticosteroids (84.6% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001), and antibiotics (88.5% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001); and a higher median value of PRAM score (4.0 (2.0-7.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-5.0); p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings would suggest the use of LUS as a safe and cheap tool used by clinicians to define the diagnosis of school-aged children with wheezing of unknown causes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 68 consecutive outpatients (mean age 9.9 years) with wheezing and suggestive signs of an acute respiratory infection. An expert sonographer, blinded to all subject characteristics, clinical course, and the study pediatrician's diagnosis, performed an LUS after spirometry and before BDT. The severity of acute respiratory symptoms was determined using the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score.
RESULTS: The LUS was positive in 38.2% (26/68) of patients [12 (46.1%) with multiple B-lines, 24 (92.3%) with consolidation, and 22 (84.6%) with pleural abnormalities]. In patients with pneumonia, asthmatic bronchitis, and asthma, the percentages of those patients with a positive LUS were 100%, 57.7%, and 0%, respectively. Of note, patients with a positive LUS were associated with an increased need for hospital admission (30.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.001), administration of oxygen therapy (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.009), oral corticosteroids (84.6% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001), and antibiotics (88.5% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001); and a higher median value of PRAM score (4.0 (2.0-7.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-5.0); p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings would suggest the use of LUS as a safe and cheap tool used by clinicians to define the diagnosis of school-aged children with wheezing of unknown causes.