Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026
A Perioperative Multidisciplinary Management Protocol for Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection: Implementation and Outcomes Analysis.
СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Lu, Guo Jiadong, Li Xing, Zhong Ning, Shu Jian
Аннотация
Effective perioperative care is critical for optimizing outcomes after lung cancer surgery. This protocol details the implementation of a structured, multidisciplinary perioperative management bundle designed to enhance recovery and reduce complications. The protocol encompasses three phases: preoperative (including risk assessment, pulmonary rehabilitation, psychological support, and nutritional optimization), intraoperative (featuring lung-protective ventilation strategies), and postoperative (emphasizing early mobilization, multimodal analgesia, and continuous multidisciplinary team coordination). To assess the feasibility and potential impact of this protocol, it was applied to a cohort of patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Clinical outcomes, including postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, perioperative recovery quality, and short-term survival, were analyzed and compared with those receiving conventional perioperative care. The results indicated that high adherence to this comprehensive protocol was associated with a significant reduction in overall postoperative complications (10.0% vs. 29.1%, P < 0.001) and postoperative pneumonia (3.3% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.022). Although the hospital length of stay was statistically comparable between the groups (7.16 ± 3.32 days vs. 7.02 ± 3.66 days, P = 0.731), the comprehensive protocol group demonstrated vastly superior recovery efficiency, characterized by a substantial reduction in maximal acute pain scores (3.47 ± 1.01 vs. 5.17 ± 1.45, P < 0.001) and a major increase in patient satisfaction (91.82 ± 3.67 vs. 83.06 ± 6.13, P < 0.001) without compromising 30-day readmission safety. Most importantly, the protocol served as an independent protective factor that markedly improved 90-day survival (10.0% mortality vs. 29.9% in the conventional care group, P < 0.001). This article provides a step-by-step guide for implementing this multidisciplinary management protocol, supported by rigorously audited clinical outcome data, serving as a practical operational framework for other institutions aiming to standardize and improve perioperative care pathways and short-term survival tracking in thoracic surgery.