MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70165-5

Медицинская библиотека · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2004

Grasping what is graspable: evidence from visual form agnosia.

McIntosh Robert D, Dijkerman H Chris, Mon-Williams Mark, Milner A David

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Patient DF has profound visual form agnosia. Despite this, she has no problem adjusting her finger-thumb grip aperture to the width of objects when reaching to grasp them. In a previous study, however, she was found to have great difficulty in scaling her grip aperture when attempting to grasp a transparent disc through two holes cut into it. This problem was attributed to a putative difference between the visual processing of size and distance in the brain, whereby DF retained the capacity for processing object size but not the separation between distinct elements such as holes. In the present study we have tested this idea more directly, and found no evidence to support such a distinction. Nonetheless, we replicated our earlier finding that DF is unable to produce normal prehension movements when attempting to grasp transparent stimuli by placing her digits into holes. We suggest that, whilst some simple objects offer themselves directly to the dorsal stream for grasping, an intact ventral stream is required to respond appropriately to more complex stimuli.

Для цитирования: McIntosh Robert D, Dijkerman H Chris, Mon-Williams Mark, Milner A David. Grasping what is graspable: evidence from visual form agnosia.. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70165-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.