MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.1.120

Медицинская библиотека · Maedica · 2025

Penetrating Brain Injury through a Pre-existing Skull Defect: Case Report.

Keffes Nikolaos, Varoutis Panagiotis, Skoulios Nikolaos, Tsitsopoulos Parmenion P, Magras Ioannis

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Introduction

Penetrating brain trauma represents about 0,4% of traumatic brain injuries. In the literature, there is a number of case studies and case-series on non-missile penetrating injuries management, but reports on penetrating brain injuries through a craniectomy are lacking. Case presentation:A 44-year-old male was transferred to the Emergency Room in a comatose state after being stabbed on the head by a sharp object at an area where a previous decompressive craniectomy took place years ago. Computed tomography of the head showed an extensive intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular extension and diffuse subarachnoid bleeding. He was immediately transferred to the operating room for hematoma evacuation and hemostasis. Postoperatively, a slight improvement in his neurological status was initially noted, but the patient's clinical course was complicated by a central nervous system infection. Following a long stay and multiple re-operations, he eventually died due to septic shock and multiorgan failure.

Conclusion

Non-missile penetrating brain injuries can be life threatening. Prognosis is dismal in those with pre-existing skull defect and severe brain damage despite aggressive medical and surgical treatment.

Для цитирования: Keffes Nikolaos, Varoutis Panagiotis, Skoulios Nikolaos, Tsitsopoulos Parmenion P, Magras Ioannis. Penetrating Brain Injury through a Pre-existing Skull Defect: Case Report.. Maedica. 2025. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.1.120.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.