Metastability and Entropy Peaks in Antagonistic Multiplex Consensus Dynamics.

Modern societies comprise overlapping communities whose opinions evolve on strongly interacting networks that are often mutually antagonistic. We introduce a minimal antagonistic multiplex consensus model in which each layer follows intra-layer majority-rule dynamics, while inter-layer interactions are inhibitory. A mean-field analysis shows that antagonistic coupling destabilizes the balanced state through an antisymmetric mode and favors two polarized absorbing states with opposite magnetization in the two layers. Network-averaged simulations confirm that small fluctuations near equal initial support determine which polarized state is ultimately reached: trajectories exhibit metastable delay, long convergence times, and a localized peak in the Shannon entropy of outcomes. A finite-size analysis with independent network realizations and bootstrap uncertainty estimates shows that the high-entropy interval narrows as Δr ∼N-γeff, with γeff=0.513 and a 95% bootstrap confidence interval [0.489,0.526], consistent with finite-size sharpening controlled by fluctuations in the initial imbalance. We also perform network topology checks and find that the qualitatively antagonistic mechanism persists beyond random-regular graphs. As an illustrative empirical application, we analyze county-level results from the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The vote-share and entropy landscapes separate low-entropy partisan strongholds from higher-entropy competitive counties. Our results suggest that antagonistic multiplex coupling provides a simple mechanism by which polarized attractors and localized outcome uncertainty can arise together.