Gerodontology · 2012
Translation and validation of the Hindi version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deshmukh Saee Prasad, Radke Usha M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To translate the original English version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) into Hindi and assess its validity and reliability for use among people in India.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: After translation into Hindi, a total of 385 participants aged 55+ demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability when used for people in India. Individual GOHAI items were recorded and summed as originally recommended. The questionnaire sought information about socio-demographic characteristics and self-reported perception of general and oral health. Clinical examination included assessment of periodontal status and number of decayed teeth, missing teeth, filled teeth and crowned teeth.
RESULT: Mean GOHAI score was 40.9 (SD, 10.6; range, 12-60). Cronbach's alpha for the GOHAI score was 0.88, indicating a high degree of internal consistency and homogeneity between the GOHAI items. The test-retest correlation coefficient for add-GOHAI scores was 0.72, indicating good stability. Add-GOHAI scores increased with poorer perceived general and oral health. Convergent validity, construct validity and discriminant validity of the GOHAI were demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: It could therefore be used as a valuable instrument for measuring oral health-related quality of life for people in this region.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: After translation into Hindi, a total of 385 participants aged 55+ demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability when used for people in India. Individual GOHAI items were recorded and summed as originally recommended. The questionnaire sought information about socio-demographic characteristics and self-reported perception of general and oral health. Clinical examination included assessment of periodontal status and number of decayed teeth, missing teeth, filled teeth and crowned teeth.
RESULT: Mean GOHAI score was 40.9 (SD, 10.6; range, 12-60). Cronbach's alpha for the GOHAI score was 0.88, indicating a high degree of internal consistency and homogeneity between the GOHAI items. The test-retest correlation coefficient for add-GOHAI scores was 0.72, indicating good stability. Add-GOHAI scores increased with poorer perceived general and oral health. Convergent validity, construct validity and discriminant validity of the GOHAI were demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: It could therefore be used as a valuable instrument for measuring oral health-related quality of life for people in this region.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthBurning Mouth SyndromeCrownsDMF IndexDental CareDental CariesEducational StatusFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHalitosisHealth StatusHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthPeriodontal DiseasesPeriodontal IndexPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSurveys and QuestionnairesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTooth LossToothbrushingTranslating