Anticancer research · 2005
Expression of inhibin/activin subunits, sialyl-lewis A (CA 19-9, sLea) and sialyl-Lewis X (sLex) carbohydrate antigens in a hydatidiform mole with persistent polymorphic trophoblastic hyperplasia.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mylonas I, Makovitzky J, Vogel M, Shabani N, Jeschke U, Friese K
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The persistence of polymorphic trophoblastic hyperplasia in a hydatidiform mole is an extremely rare condition. Its early diagnosis is essential since such cases can transform into invasive tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The paraffin-embedded biopsies were routinely stained with HE. Immunohistochemical staining reactions were performed with monoclonal antibodies against inhibin-alpha, inhibin-betaA and inhibin-betaB subunits. Additional immunohistochemical reaction was performed with, Sialyl-Lewis A and Sialyl-Lewis X and glycodelin.
RESULTS: Large villi and hydatidiform villi with ranging syncyctio- and cytotrophoblasts were seen. Intervillous proliferating trophoblasts showed cell- and nuclear polymorphy with invasion of the myometrium wall. The immunohistochemistry exhibited strong positivity for inhibin-alpha, inhibin-betaA and inhibin-betaB subunits in trophoblastic tissue, while the decidua was negative. Sialyl-Lewis A and Sialyl-Lewis X showed no or minimal focal immunohistochemical reaction.
CONCLUSION: A complete hydatidiform mole with hyperplasia and proliferation presents a high risk of developing a persistent (eventually metastatic) trophoblastic disorder and, in up to 15% of the cases, an invasive mole. In 2.5% of the cases it can transform into a choriocarcinoma. Since the inhibin/activin subunits reacted positively with trophoblastic tissue, they might be a useful diagnostic marker for hydatidiform mole with persistence of polymorphic trophoblastic hyperplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The paraffin-embedded biopsies were routinely stained with HE. Immunohistochemical staining reactions were performed with monoclonal antibodies against inhibin-alpha, inhibin-betaA and inhibin-betaB subunits. Additional immunohistochemical reaction was performed with, Sialyl-Lewis A and Sialyl-Lewis X and glycodelin.
RESULTS: Large villi and hydatidiform villi with ranging syncyctio- and cytotrophoblasts were seen. Intervillous proliferating trophoblasts showed cell- and nuclear polymorphy with invasion of the myometrium wall. The immunohistochemistry exhibited strong positivity for inhibin-alpha, inhibin-betaA and inhibin-betaB subunits in trophoblastic tissue, while the decidua was negative. Sialyl-Lewis A and Sialyl-Lewis X showed no or minimal focal immunohistochemical reaction.
CONCLUSION: A complete hydatidiform mole with hyperplasia and proliferation presents a high risk of developing a persistent (eventually metastatic) trophoblastic disorder and, in up to 15% of the cases, an invasive mole. In 2.5% of the cases it can transform into a choriocarcinoma. Since the inhibin/activin subunits reacted positively with trophoblastic tissue, they might be a useful diagnostic marker for hydatidiform mole with persistence of polymorphic trophoblastic hyperplasia.