Ross Confers More Favorable Left Ventricular Remodeling Compared With Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background

Aortic valve disease results in left ventricular (LV) dilation and/or hypertrophy. Valve intervention may improve, but not normalize flow dynamics. We hypothesized that LV remodeling would be more favorable following the Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR).

Methods

Patients who were 18 to 50 years of age and underwent Ross or mAVR from 2000 to 2016 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed and yielded 27 well-matched pairs. Demographics and echocardiographic variables of LV morphology and wall thickness were collected. Those with > mild residual valve disease were excluded. Primary endpoints included LV morphology. T test and Fisher exact test analysis were used for statistical comparison.

Results

Average age at operation (Ross 35.3 ± 10.2 vs mAVR 37.3 ± 8.9 years) did not differ. Indication for operation was similar between groups. Preoperative echocardiographic variables did not differ. At average follow-up duration (Ross 7.9 ± 2.4 vs mAVR 7.3 ± 2.4 years), wall thickness was significantly smaller for Ross compared with mAVR (P = .00715). Only 4/27 (15%) of mAVR patients had normalized LV parameters compared with 16/27 (59%) of Ross patients (P = .000813). Residual hypertrophy was the most common long-term abnormality for mAVR.

Conclusion

Following aortic valve replacement with the Ross procedure or mechanical aortic valve prosthesis, the Ross conferred more favorable LV remodeling compared with mAVR. Future directions include analyzing longer follow-up to determine if patterns persist and the impact on cardiac morbidity and mortality.