American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025
Variability in Nurse-Administered Swallow Screens for Patients After Acute Stroke: Insights From the Electronic Health Record.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rock Jenna, Michaelson Gillian, Nahra Alexis, Cabrera Claudia I, Howard N Scott, Maronian Nicole C, Zhao Nina W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Nursing-driven swallow screens are a critical component of poststroke dysphagia evaluations to prevent aspiration and pneumonia. There are multiple screening protocols but no consensus tool. This study aimed to characterize variations in nurse-administered swallow screening documentation for poststroke patients by examining templates in the electronic health record (EHR) and comparing them to established protocols.
METHOD: Between August 2023 and January 2024, the keywords "stroke swallow screen" were searched in the Epic Community Library, a public database of documentation templates from institutions using the Epic EHR. Adult inpatient nurse-administered swallow templates were included. Pediatric, emergency department, speech-language pathology, and nonswallow screen templates were excluded. Data including hospital location, setting (academic, community, international), and protocol details of oral trials were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 157 included templates, nearly all (152/157, 96.8%) incorporated water during oral trials, with 3 oz/90 mL as the most common specified volume (n = 115). Fewer than half (71/157, 45.2%) aligned with established screening protocols; the most frequently identified were the Yale Swallow Protocol (35/157, 22.3%) and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital-Stroke Dysphagia Screen (23/157, 14.6%). No significant association was found between institution setting and presence of an established screening protocol (p > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Review of nurse-administered swallow screening documentation templates for patients after acute stroke highlights substantial variability despite widespread use of water-based trials. Most templates did not align with an established protocol. These findings suggest an opportunity to standardize documentation across hospital systems to support consistent practice and reduce adverse outcomes related to dysphagia after stroke.
METHOD: Between August 2023 and January 2024, the keywords "stroke swallow screen" were searched in the Epic Community Library, a public database of documentation templates from institutions using the Epic EHR. Adult inpatient nurse-administered swallow templates were included. Pediatric, emergency department, speech-language pathology, and nonswallow screen templates were excluded. Data including hospital location, setting (academic, community, international), and protocol details of oral trials were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 157 included templates, nearly all (152/157, 96.8%) incorporated water during oral trials, with 3 oz/90 mL as the most common specified volume (n = 115). Fewer than half (71/157, 45.2%) aligned with established screening protocols; the most frequently identified were the Yale Swallow Protocol (35/157, 22.3%) and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital-Stroke Dysphagia Screen (23/157, 14.6%). No significant association was found between institution setting and presence of an established screening protocol (p > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Review of nurse-administered swallow screening documentation templates for patients after acute stroke highlights substantial variability despite widespread use of water-based trials. Most templates did not align with an established protocol. These findings suggest an opportunity to standardize documentation across hospital systems to support consistent practice and reduce adverse outcomes related to dysphagia after stroke.