MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 1994

[Satisfactory results of surgical reconstruction of rotator cuff ruptures, 1984-1990].

Holtslag H R, Jaspers P J, Marting L N, Schulte L A, van der Hoeven H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the middle-long term results of open surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears and identification of pre- and peroperative parameters with predictive value for the final result.

DESIGN

Retrospective study (1984-1990).

SETTING

Department of orthopaedics of the Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

METHOD: All patients were asked to cooperate on an extensive standard anamnesis and physical examination. Re-evaluation of the X-rays, arthrograms and operation reports took place. There were three stragglers.

RESULTS

The follow-up concerned 41 shoulders in 40 patients (21 women, 19 men). The average age was 61 years (37-77). The average postoperative period was 5 years (2.5-9.2). The subjective final result was satisfactory in 80% as judged by persistent complaints and function of the operated shoulder. Young and active patients were less satisfied with the final result than older, female patients. More persistent complaints were seen in larger and longer existing cuff tears.

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears gave a satisfying result, as described in literature. Sex, age, level of activity and size of the tear appeared to be predictive parameters for the subjective final result.

Для цитирования: Holtslag H R, Jaspers P J, Marting L N, Schulte L A, van der Hoeven H. [Satisfactory results of surgical reconstruction of rotator cuff ruptures, 1984-1990].. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 1994.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.