MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.047

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2008

Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action.

Komesu Yuko M, Ketai Loren H, Rogers Rebecca G, Eberhardt Steven C, Pohl Jennifer

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine incontinence pessaries' mechanism of action by measuring changes on urodynamic studies (UDS) and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without pessaries in place.

STUDY

DESIGN

Women with stress incontinence had UDS and MRI performed with and without incontinence dish pessaries.

RESULTS

Fifteen women were evaluated. Pessary insertion resulted in increased urethral resistance; detrusor pressures increased (33-45 cm H(2)O) and maximal flow rates decreased (30 to 19 mL/second). With Valsalva on MRI, pessaries were associated with decreased posterior urethrovesical angles (175-130 degrees), bladder neck elevation (0.3 below to 0 .8 cm above the pubococcygeal line) and increased urethral lengths (2.4 to 2.97 cm). Bladder neck funneling with cough occurred in 14 patients without pessaries and 3 with pessaries.

CONCLUSION

On UDS and MRI following pessary placement, continence restoration was associated with decreased posterior urethrovesical angles, bladder neck descent and funneling, and increased urethral lengths and resistance to urine flow.

Для цитирования: Komesu Yuko M, Ketai Loren H, Rogers Rebecca G, Eberhardt Steven C, Pohl Jennifer. Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.