MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Klinicheskaia meditsina · 1995

[Therapeutic tactics and results of prostatic adenomectomy in the presence of aggravating factors].

Dovlatian A A

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Outcomes of radical surgery for prostatic adenoma have been analyzed for 426 patients divided into 3 groups. Group 1 included 160 patients subjected to urgent adenomectomy for acute urine retention, group 2 comprised 166 patients with severe intercurrent diseases subjected to one- and two-stage radical surgery, group 3 of 100 patients was free of intercurrent diseases. Urgent and delayed (within 72 hours and 5-10 days, respectively) radical adenomectomies are thought valid in management of acute urinary retention in patients with prostatic adenoma. Adequate preoperative preparation in deficient circulation, diabetes mellitus and other preexisting or concurrent diseases increased by 20-30% indications to the operation. Good outcomes were reported in 90%, 81.4% and 94% of patients from group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. 98.7% of 388 patients avoided suprapubic fistula and resumed natural urination. Only 1.3% of patients were discharged with cystostomy drainage of the bladder because of urethral stricture, urethrorectal fistula, renal failure and pyelonephritis. The differential approach provided good outcomes in 87.6% of seriously ill patients in overall hospital lethality 8.9%. The majority of the lethal outcomes resulted from purulent pyelonephritis (71%). The rest cases were due to acute affections of circulation, respiration and digestion.

Для цитирования: Dovlatian A A. [Therapeutic tactics and results of prostatic adenomectomy in the presence of aggravating factors].. Klinicheskaia meditsina. 1995.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.