Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025
Implementation Considerations for Electronic Partner Notification for Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Qualitative Analysis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eliazer Caleb, Jarolimova Jana, Zionts Dani, Garcia Mabelin, Magallan Valeria, Thiim Aron, Sullivan Ben, Parker Robert A, Platt Laura, Psaros Christina, Ard Kevin L, Bassett Ingrid V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Electronic partner notification (ePN) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is a promising tool for linking exposed individuals to STI testing and treatment. Statewide ePN will target rising rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea in Massachusetts (MA).
METHODS: We explored implementation factors and barriers and facilitators to ePN for priority populations using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We conducted in-depth interviews with men who have sex with men (n = 56) and transgender women (n = 4) recruited from sexual health clinics, community organizations, and online platforms in greater Boston, MA. Content analysis was used to organize implementation factors, barriers and facilitators, and innovation adaptations to mitigate barriers and emphasize facilitators.
RESULTS: Participants' median age was 27.5 years (interquartile range, 23-33 years); 32% were White, 27% Black, and 22% Hispanic. Overall, participants reacted positively to ePN. Contextual factors include STI stigma and familiarity with contact tracing from the COVID-19 pandemic; barriers and facilitators-varying in direction-include the prevalence of anonymous sexual encounters, comfort with clinicians, and patterns of accessing sexual health services. Individual-level factors include privacy concerns and the nature of relationships between sexual partners. Individual-level facilitators include pre-existing knowledge of digital tools and sexual health services, notifiers' degree of motivation for using ePN, and the perceived value of partner notification. Trust in an ePN notification was identified as an important factor in determining whether individuals seek care.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic partner notification is a promising tool to combat rising STI rates. Electronic partner notification implementors must recognize the importance of key barriers, facilitators, and trust.
METHODS: We explored implementation factors and barriers and facilitators to ePN for priority populations using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We conducted in-depth interviews with men who have sex with men (n = 56) and transgender women (n = 4) recruited from sexual health clinics, community organizations, and online platforms in greater Boston, MA. Content analysis was used to organize implementation factors, barriers and facilitators, and innovation adaptations to mitigate barriers and emphasize facilitators.
RESULTS: Participants' median age was 27.5 years (interquartile range, 23-33 years); 32% were White, 27% Black, and 22% Hispanic. Overall, participants reacted positively to ePN. Contextual factors include STI stigma and familiarity with contact tracing from the COVID-19 pandemic; barriers and facilitators-varying in direction-include the prevalence of anonymous sexual encounters, comfort with clinicians, and patterns of accessing sexual health services. Individual-level factors include privacy concerns and the nature of relationships between sexual partners. Individual-level facilitators include pre-existing knowledge of digital tools and sexual health services, notifiers' degree of motivation for using ePN, and the perceived value of partner notification. Trust in an ePN notification was identified as an important factor in determining whether individuals seek care.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic partner notification is a promising tool to combat rising STI rates. Electronic partner notification implementors must recognize the importance of key barriers, facilitators, and trust.