Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993) · 2017
Decreased left atrial myocardial strain in patients with suboptimal blood pressure control.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Xiao-Jing, Chen Chen, Liang Yu-Jia, Gao Xi-Lian, Jiang Jing, Kang Yu, Chen Yu-Cheng, Zhang Qing, Zeng Zhi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control is commonly observed in patients receiving antihypertensive agents, but the relationship between uncontrolled BP and left atrial (LA) impairment remains unknown.
METHODS: This study enrolled 279 hypertensive patients who had been medicated, as well as 85 matched normal controls. The BP of systolic <140 mmHg and diastolic<90 mmHg was defined as optimal (HT1 group, n=146), otherwise as suboptimal BP control (HT2 group, n = 133). LA myocardial function was assessed by the systolic (SSa), early diastolic (SEa), and late diastolic (SAa) LA strains.
RESULTS: Both the HT1 group and HT2 group had higher BP reading, thicker interventricular septum, larger LA volume index, and enhanced active atrial emptying fraction than the control group (all <0.05). When compared with normal subjects, hypertensive patients displayed obvious reduction in the SSa (50.0 ± 10.9 vs. 35.9 ± 8.0%), SEa (30.1 ± 7.7 vs. 18.5 ± 7.1%) and SAa (19.9 ± 6.4 vs. 17.8 ± 4.2%) (all p < 0.001). In addition to a further impaired SEa found in the HT2 group than in the HT1 group (17.2 ± 5.3 vs. 19.8 ± 8.3%, p = 0.002), the treated BP of >140/90 mmHg appeared an independent risk factor associated with the abnormal SEa (odds ratio, 2.957; interval of confidence, 1.614-5.415; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal BP control status in hypertensive patients is related to a further reduction of LA myocardial function assessed by the novel 2DSTI free strain, and suboptimal BP might be regarded as a composite risk factor and therefore a simplified treatment target. However, the prognostic value of LA free strain in patients with inability to achieve the BP target needs to be evaluated in future prospective studies.
METHODS: This study enrolled 279 hypertensive patients who had been medicated, as well as 85 matched normal controls. The BP of systolic <140 mmHg and diastolic<90 mmHg was defined as optimal (HT1 group, n=146), otherwise as suboptimal BP control (HT2 group, n = 133). LA myocardial function was assessed by the systolic (SSa), early diastolic (SEa), and late diastolic (SAa) LA strains.
RESULTS: Both the HT1 group and HT2 group had higher BP reading, thicker interventricular septum, larger LA volume index, and enhanced active atrial emptying fraction than the control group (all <0.05). When compared with normal subjects, hypertensive patients displayed obvious reduction in the SSa (50.0 ± 10.9 vs. 35.9 ± 8.0%), SEa (30.1 ± 7.7 vs. 18.5 ± 7.1%) and SAa (19.9 ± 6.4 vs. 17.8 ± 4.2%) (all p < 0.001). In addition to a further impaired SEa found in the HT2 group than in the HT1 group (17.2 ± 5.3 vs. 19.8 ± 8.3%, p = 0.002), the treated BP of >140/90 mmHg appeared an independent risk factor associated with the abnormal SEa (odds ratio, 2.957; interval of confidence, 1.614-5.415; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal BP control status in hypertensive patients is related to a further reduction of LA myocardial function assessed by the novel 2DSTI free strain, and suboptimal BP might be regarded as a composite risk factor and therefore a simplified treatment target. However, the prognostic value of LA free strain in patients with inability to achieve the BP target needs to be evaluated in future prospective studies.