MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021

Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Al-Naseem Abdulrahman, Sallam Abdelrahman, Gonnah Ahmed, Masoud Omar, Abd-El-Barr Muhammad M, Aleem Ilyas S

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration (minutes), intraoperative bleeding (mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drilling frequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Four observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD = - 24.66, p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD = - 10.37, P < 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = - 2.15, P < 0.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = - 2.42, P =  < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques.

Для цитирования: Al-Naseem Abdulrahman, Sallam Abdelrahman, Gonnah Ahmed, Masoud Omar, Abd-El-Barr Muhammad M, Aleem Ilyas S. Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.