DOI 10.1080/13625187.2018.1471131
Laparoscopic salpingectomy and removal of Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation device: a case series.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Tubal sterilisation using Essure is a minimally invasive technique for permanent contraception, with high rates of patient satisfaction. However, some women subsequently choose removal of the inserts, due to side effects such as pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, dyspareunia or allergic dermatitis. This case series presents the management of eight women who underwent laparoscopic removal of Essure inserts in conjunction with salpingectomy. We describe our surgical technique, its underlying principles and immediate surgical outcomes.
METHODS
Eight patients were identified as having undergone removal of Essure inserts, via an electronic search of the surgical procedures database. A retrospective review of case records was undertaken. The primary outcome was safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic salpingectomy approach. Secondary outcome measures included implant fracture rate, operative time, blood loss and length of patient stay.
RESULTS
All eight women were able to undergo laparoscopic salpingectomy and removal of the Essure inserts without the need for laparotomy or hysterectomy. There were no incidences of fracture or incomplete removal of the insert. Immediate postoperative recovery was uncomplicated in all eight women; the mean length of stay was 17 h. One patient had a small bowel serosal tear attributed to laparoscopic entry.
CONCLUSION
This case series suggests that laparoscopic salpingectomy for removal of Essure inserts is safe and feasible. We acknowledge that the numbers were small. However, consistent use of a laparoscopic approach in these eight patients indicates that this procedure is a feasible and suitable alternative to hysterectomy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.