Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2026
Machine learning-assisted risk assessment for fluoroquinolone treatment in Chryseobacterium indologenes bacteremia: A comparative study of model performance and clinical calibration.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Ruei-Chang, Chen Peng-Ciao, Wang Ying-Chuan, Chen Li-Ying, Shang Hung-Sheng, Chiu Chun-Hsiang
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Chryseobacterium indologenes bacteremia poses significant therapeutic challenges due to intrinsic multidrug resistance and the absence of established Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for fluoroquinolones. We aimed to develop machine learning models to predict mortality and guide fluoroquinolone treatment decisions.
METHODS: In this retrospective study of 61 patients, we compared Logistic Regression, Conservative Random Forest, and two Calibrated Random Forest variants (Sigmoid/Isotonic) using Borderline Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique and conservative parameter settings to address small-sample limitations.
RESULTS: Mortality was 21.3%, with shock identified as the strongest predictor (p < 0.001). Conservative Random Forest achieved the highest area under the curve (0.908) and good calibration stability. Notably, complex calibration methods yielded unstable probability curves, revealing a "calibration paradox" in small-sample settings. A risk stratification system based on optimal models successfully identified low-risk patients suitable for fluoroquinolone therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: For rare infections with limited data, robust, conservative RF demonstrated a trend of stable calibration characteristics. This study provides an objective clinical decision support tool for Chryseobacterium indologenes treatment when standard susceptibility interpretation is unavailable.
METHODS: In this retrospective study of 61 patients, we compared Logistic Regression, Conservative Random Forest, and two Calibrated Random Forest variants (Sigmoid/Isotonic) using Borderline Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique and conservative parameter settings to address small-sample limitations.
RESULTS: Mortality was 21.3%, with shock identified as the strongest predictor (p < 0.001). Conservative Random Forest achieved the highest area under the curve (0.908) and good calibration stability. Notably, complex calibration methods yielded unstable probability curves, revealing a "calibration paradox" in small-sample settings. A risk stratification system based on optimal models successfully identified low-risk patients suitable for fluoroquinolone therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: For rare infections with limited data, robust, conservative RF demonstrated a trend of stable calibration characteristics. This study provides an objective clinical decision support tool for Chryseobacterium indologenes treatment when standard susceptibility interpretation is unavailable.