MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1891/0730-0832.39.4.189

Медицинская библиотека · Neonatal network : NN · 2020

A Comparison of Moderate to Late Preterm Neonates Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Australian Tertiary and Nontertiary Centers.

Patterson Helen Ruth, Pollock Wendy

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Transfer of neonates ≥32 weeks' gestation with acute respiratory distress to tertiary (T) centers can be reduced by treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in nontertiary (NT) centers. This can lead to considerable financial and emotional benefits. The aim of this project was to compare management of nCPAP in T and NT centers.

DESIGN

Five-year retrospective, observational cohort study (2010-2014).

SAMPLE: All NT eligible neonates from four sites (n = 484) were compared with a similar randomized cohort of inborn neonates at two T centers (n = 601) in Victoria, Australia.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Any difference in management or short-term outcome.

RESULTS

Moderately preterm and term neonates born in NT centers had lower Apgar scores at five minutes of age and received more conservative management delivered by different equipment. Despite a higher incidence of air leaks in NT centers, the short-term outcomes were otherwise similar between centers. T centers were more likely to administer nCPAP to term babies for <24 hours.

Для цитирования: Patterson Helen Ruth, Pollock Wendy. A Comparison of Moderate to Late Preterm Neonates Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Australian Tertiary and Nontertiary Centers.. Neonatal network : NN. 2020. DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832.39.4.189.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.